"It’s weakening local democracy" Bedford councillors urged to raise 'weakness in the law' with government over constitution change

Bedford Borough Council. Image: LDRSBedford Borough Council. Image: LDRS
Bedford Borough Council. Image: LDRS
Bedford borough councillors have been urged to raise concerns with the government over what they describe as a democratic weakness in the law, as the council updates its constitution to align with a legal requirement that has existed for more than two decades.

The constitutional update, debated at the Full Council meeting on March 19, follows a law introduced by the last Labour government in 2002, which limits the power of full council to overturn executive decisions.

Councillor Henry Vann (Lib Dem, De Parys) explained that the changes are necessary to ensure legal compliance while maintaining councillors’ rights to scrutinize decisions.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“[This is] effectively tidying up the constitution as a prelude to the separate wider review of the constitution being undertaken at the moment with LGA [Local Government Association] support,” he said.

“And ensuring it is legally compliant whilst protecting elected members’ rights to ask questions, receive reports, and actually interrogate information.”

Councillor Vann said the changes “largely reflect existing practice”, but he was aware of press coverage about “one small part” of the updates.

“Which reflects the legislation as it stands today regarding the call-in procedure – it clarifies our constitution to match the primary legislation,” he said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“If we don’t make the change this evening then the primary legislation will still trump our constitution, I’m afraid, because that’s how that works.”

The law states that if full council votes to overrule an executive decision following a call-in, it can only refer the matter back to the executive for reconsideration, rather than overturning it outright.

Councillor Vann called this “deeply concerning for democracy,” as it limits the role of elected representatives in decision-making.

“Regardless of individuals in the role,” he said.

Councillor Graeme Coombes (Conservative, Wixams and Wilstead) said he found himself in the “rather unique position of agreeing with councillor Vann”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“He is right, this is bringing our constitution in line with the law, and I think it is important we do that,” he said.

“We can debate separately as to whether the law is correct and the powers of elected mayors and all of those things.

“There’s a discussion to be to be had if you think things should change, but that’s not the position we find ourselves in,” he said.

Councillor Lucy Bywater (Green, Castle and Newnham) said: “I think we can do something, we can write to the minister to say we’re worried about democracy.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We’re worried about the voice of elected representatives locally, being trumped by a minority administration mayor.

“We should make our voices heard, we don’t agree with this, it’s weakening local democracy,” she said.

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

News you can trust since 1845
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice