Bedford village hotel loses planning battle to build four homes
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Bedford Council had rejected the planning application at Woodland Manor Hotel in Green Lane, Clapham, in February this year so Kailash Chander Suri took it to appeal.
Planning inspector Martin Chandler decided that the plan did not display enough merits to overturn the council’s local plan policies.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAfter visiting the site in October Mr Chandler said: “I have found that the proposal would fail to accord with the relevant policies and that other material considerations are not substantial enough to indicate a decision contrary to the development plan.”
Mr Chandler said the plan had some things going for it, including bringing new residents in who would spend money.
But because only four homes were planned, he said that benefit would be limited.
Clapham has been earmarked for 500 new homes, but this site, on the outskirts of the village has not been identified as one that local people want developed.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAnd the borough council has policies for deciding where housing should be built, which the inspector decided were in line with national planning rules.
Mr Chandler, in his decision letter sent on November 19, said that even though the hotel has been given permission for more accommodation in the same location, he would not allow it.
“The absence of harm does not represent a benefit of a proposal and consequently, this matter does not weigh in favour of the appeal,” he said.
“Although there is clearly a housing need, I have no evidence before me that the proposal would respond to an identified community need.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“I also have no evidence before me to suggest that there is identifiable community support for the proposal.”
Mr Chandler added that the council’s local plan does not create a moratorium on new housing outside village boundaries but it does have a suitable set of rules.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.