Bedford council gives out more than £1 million in staff exit payments
27 people were made redundant in 2020-21 - and 41 the year before
Bedford council let dozens of employees go last year, figures show, costing more than £1 million in redundancy payments.
The Association of Local Authority Chief Executives and Senior Managers (ALACE) said job losses will continue across England because the Government does not see local councils as a priority.
Figures from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) show 27 exit packages, totalling £1.6 million were awarded by Bedford Borough Council in 2020-21.
Three men in drugs arrest in Bedford's Queen's Park following tip-off
National Rail strike: Only travel if your journey is essential, Bedford commuters told
Bedford drivers have 10 road closures to avoid - including A421 and A1
Grass fire narrowly averted after car bursts into flames on A1 at Wyboston
Police release CCTV image of men they want to speak to following Bedford 'incident'
There were 41 staff laid off the previous year, at a cost of £1.1 million.
A Bedford Borough Council spokesperson said: “The council continues to face financial challenges due to rising demand, the increased pressure on services caused by the pandemic and reducing government funding.
“Our transformation programme has already delivered £18 million a year savings, and is working to make the council more efficient through better use of technology and reviewing our services. Where this means staff leave the council because of redundancy, payments are made in line with existing contractual arrangements.”
The total value of exit packages nationally more than halved from £544 million in 2016-17 to £252 million last year in real terms.
Ian Miller, honorary secretary of the ALACE, said: "The higher spend between 2014 and 2017 reflects that councils were making very significant reductions in their workforce at that time as a result of the Government's austerity programme which has cut funding for local government since 2010.
"Job cuts will continue because local government has not been a priority for this or previous governments."
He added that councils aim to protect frontline services, and that workforce reductions slowed in 2020-21 because the focus was on responding to the pandemic.
Since 2014-15, the average cost of exit payments has risen by 31 per cent for senior employees – when adjusted for inflation – and 15 per cent for those below this level.
Mr Miller said costs for older employees tend to be higher as the local government pension scheme requires immediate payment of pension rights where someone over 55 is made redundant, or let go to make the council run more efficiently.
The figures were published as part of the Government's research into ending "excessively high" exit payments in the public sector.
Legislation passed last year – which capped payments at £95,000 – was revoked in February after the Government admitted it may have had "unintended consequences" for the lowest paid workers.
Mr Miller said the figures show there is no need for a cap when the average exit payment is just £26,703.
The average cost of all exit packages in Bedford last year was much higher, at £58,699 – up from £26,957 in 2019-20.
The Local Government Association (LGA) said its survey of local authorities indicated that many planned redundancies in 2020 and 2021 for several reasons, including funding shortages and local government reorganisation.
It said council restructures tend to be focused on removing senior posts, which means older, longer-serving and higher paid staff are often the ones affected – and these workers are also more likely to volunteer for redundancy.
An LGA spokesman said: "Councils are required to ensure termination payments are fair, proportionate, lawful and provide value for money for the taxpayer."
The MHCLG said councils are best placed to make decisions, but that the Government is still committed to tackling excessive exit payments.
An MHCLG spokeswoman added: “Severance pay is the responsibility of individual councils and we urge them to ensure that payments reflect value for money to the taxpayers who fund them.”