Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Town make it tough to pick a man out

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 November 2009
How the Hatters rated


Kevin Pilkington: 6.5 – Had very little to do, but what he did do he did competently and was brave and alert when necessary.

Freddie Murray: 8 – Competed doggedly against his former club and barely put a foot wrong all afternoon.

Alan White: 8.5 – Conditions suited him down to the ground, the dominating centre-half was made for games like these.

Shane Blackett: 8.5 – Almost flawless in the air and solid on the deck, looked in his element.

George Pilkington: 8 – Never quite as good at right-back but helped to give the Hatters real structure and solidity. Distributed the ball well.

Keith Keane: 8 – Formed a formidable central midfield partnership with Nicholls. Broke up the play at every opportunity and helped to keep Town ticking.

Kevin Nicholls: 8.5 – His best game in a long time. Back at the heart of things for the Hatters. He won plenty of ball and used it wisely.

Claude Gnakpa: 7.5 – Produced some real quality for Luton on a day when dogged determination was the prerequisite.

Adam Newton: 7.5 – Not a natural left-winger but his pace and work ethic mean he will do a decent job in any position.

Kevin Gallen: 8 – Took his goal well and used his body to good effect but lacked the legs to really hinder Grays defence.

Tom Craddock: 8 – Well deserved goal, brought his drought to an end. Now is the time to kick on for the young striker.

Mark Nwokeji: 7 – Pacy and deceptive, he brings an explosive new dimension to Town's strikeforce.

Jake Howells: 6.5 – Got stuck in and helped to see the Hatters over the finishing line.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 November 2009 6:29 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Luton
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.